how committees kill firms

businesswoman working at deskwhy managing partners need to be accountable.

by bill reeb and dominic cingoranelli

as we have said so many times before, everyone likes the idea that “i” will hold “me” accountable. but few like the idea of “anyone else” holding “them” accountable.

more on performance management: the job of managing partner: empowered or emasculated? | partners as role models: the good, bad & ugly | managing the managing partner | pay varies when performance varies | accountability is for everyone | who decides what? | cpa firm performance assessments: 15 core competencies, 21 questions

so, once it is decided that accountability is important and someone needs to be responsible for implementation, the discussion quickly shifts to “let’s form a group of people, like an executive committee or a compensation committee to hold us accountable.”
read more →

do you want to keep this employee?

how to decide whether employees deserve raises… or jobs.

by ed mendlowitz
the 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 practice doctor

question: i have a longtime employee who asked me for a 33 percent salary increase, or she said she would have to explore options. how do you suggest i handle this?

more practice doctor q&a: not the mp, still a ‘managing’ partner | 34 ways to make more money | why this help wanted ad is all wrong | why credentials are worthwhile | i made partner, now what?

additional information: she works five hour days every day and is paid by the hour. she gives me no added time during tax season. she also gets paid for an extra six days – which is for half of the firm’s allowed holidays – and for eight days for combined sick, vacation and personal days, and i pay her for half of her required cpe time (payment for 20 hours) and all the registration costs.

read more →

how to set the managing partner’s compensation

businessman holding multiple dollar signsa management stipend keeps the mp “whole.”

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

many firms, especially under $10 million, have a partner on board with the title of managing partner who in reality functions more as an admin partner. this post only addresses how the true mp should be compensated.

more on partner compensation: how large and small firms allocate income | integrating partner comp with strategic planning partner pay: the declining importance of book of business | 3 non-performance-based comp systems | 3 subjective compensation systems | partner compensation 101

ok, for those of you dying to know what a true mp is, here’s the scoop. a true mp:
read more →

the job of managing partner: empowered or emasculated?

woman executive coaching a male employee across deskwhy eat-what-you-kill firm cultures produce weak ceos.

by bill reeb and dominic cingoranelli

let’s review some best practices as to how the managing partner is elected, what is expected, for what term and how he or she is protected if removed from that role.

more on performance management: how to monitor goal progress | how to implement strategy, step by step | how to decide who decides pay | accountability includes partners | succession plan requirements | how retired partners are robbing their own firms | 4 ways to create more capacity | partner retirement and the war for clients | succession: the questions to care about | hazards of not reallocating equity | cpa firm performance assessments: 15 core competencies, 21 questions | 5 harmful management attitudes (and how to fix them)

the job differs whether it is being filled under the eat what you kill (ewyk) or building a village (bav) models. for example, under the ewyk model, the managing partner is likely the largest equity partner, or if not, then the default would be that the role of the managing partner would be that of administrative partner.  because the ewyk model is usually a silo model built around superstars, the managing partner’s role is to handle all of the matters that the other partners don’t want to do.  it is not uncommon in these scenarios that the managing partner earns a stipend to fill that position, and that the stipend is not very much (maybe $25,000 to $75,000 a year).

read more →

how large and small firms allocate income

dollar on question markhow many of these 8 criteria does your firm use?

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

for purposes of this post, we will group cpa firms according to five different sizes:

more on partner compensation: integrating partner comp with strategic planning crash course: operating a compensation committee partner pay: open vs. closed compensation systems | the 3 best partner compensation formulas 11 points in designing a partner comp system | what partners earn and how they earn it | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

  1. the big 4. they are the ultimate of sophistication, running their firms as true, colossal corporations, regardless of their legal entity. virtually none of this post relates to big 4 firms.
  1. the top 100 firms, excluding the big 4. the 100th largest firm was $33 million in 2015.
  1. multipartner firms from $15 million to $33 million.
  1. multipartner firms from $5 million to $15 million.
  1. multipartner firms below $5 million.

read more →