the delicate art of positioning your firm in the mind of the prospect

and, it’snota mission statement.

by bruce w. marcus
professional services marketing 3.0

there is no great mystique to the marketing concept ofpositioning.while it’s not as simple as some would make it seem, nor as complex as others would have you believe, it’s still very real.

bruce w. marcus
bruce w. marcus

more for 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 pro members:who’s better at marketing?lawyers or cpas?even a random disaster can be controlled with risk managementmanaging risk in client relationsyour clients love you? what if you’re wrong?the three degrees of riskfour essential habits for building client trustthe nine hallmarks of a marketing culturethe four cornerstones to building a marketing culturegetting the client is only half the battlepractice development: it’s not rocket sciencenine fundamentals for a healthy marketing culture in an accounting firm

look inside

like so many words used in marketing,positioninghas come to be shorthand for some ideas that have come a long way in the pursuit of sound marketing practice. first popularized byries and trout in their 1981 book,positioning,the concept took a basic advertising practice and codified it in a way that made it possible for other marketers to think differently about approaches to the market.

卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 research has uncovered the startling fact of the wide disparity between how accounting firm management perceives their own performance and how their clients see their performance.(join the survey; get the results.)

the basic idea of positioning is simple. or at least, simple to state.

if you think of marketing as a process to move goods and services to the consumer, there are two ways to view the process — either you sell people what they want, or you try to persuade people to want to buy what you want to sell. the second is an almost inevitably fruitless exercise in egocentric behavior.i can make you buy anything because i’m a good salesman. it’san uphill trudge, and yet, it seems to be the way to which most people gravitate.

selling people what they want is obviously the better way, although it’s not without its rigors. how do you know what they want? how dotheyknow what they want? when nylon was invented in the 1940s, could you have asked women who had never heard of the stuff if they wanted nylon hose?

we do know that people buy what they need. they aresoldwhat they’re persuaded they need. and if you have to persuade people that they need something, isn’t that the same as selling what you want to sell?

not quite — if you can cast your product or service in a context that addresses the consumer’s needs or concerns. dupont solved the nylon problem by asking, “would you be interested in hose that were as sheer or beautiful as silk hose, but wore like iron, and didn’t cost any more than silk?”

and that was positioning before the word was ever used. dupont, and other good marketers of their day, did three things:

  1. they defined consumer expectations
  2. they figured out how to meet those expectations with a product they had developed that nobody had ever heard of.
  3. they asked themselves, “what fact or value can we communicate to the market that would address those expectations and concerns?”

from those three points they developed the marketing campaign that sold nylons. that’s positioning.

and these three points, articulated by marketing consultant peter horowitz, define the clearest approach to positioning that might be used by an accounting, law, or consulting firm today — no matter what the size of the firm.

but articulating a position is hardly a total marketing plan. a number of elements must be addressed to turn a position into a marketing plan.

a caveat. there is a distinct difference, too often ignored, between apositionand amission.

amissionis a projection of objectives. it defines what the firm thinks its purpose is — where it would like to go in the business context … how it would like to serve its clients … how it would like to be perceived by the community it serves. it is, essentially, a wish list and a blueprint for the company. but a mission is the company’s business, not the consumer’s. i say to you, “i would like you to be my friend and for you to love me.” that’s my mission. and you say to me, “that may be what you want, but what’s that got to do with what i want? why should i be your friend, and what have you done for me that’s lovable?”

no, a mission statement is not a position.

nor is it a niche, in which you choose a specific capability, or a specific industry, and promote your capabilities or experience in that industry to a carefully defined audience. in fact, positioning enhances both niche and target marketing.

a position says, “i understand what you want and need, and what concerns you most, and i’m going to give it to you.”

in practical terms, how does it work? nine more caveats:

  1. the position must stem from the best possibleunderstanding of the needs, aspirations, and expectations of the prospective clientele. there should be a perception of what your market most wants of a firm like yours — and that perception comes ideally from research. at least two of the top tier accounting firms have spent several million dollars each on just this kind of research. if you don’t have that kind of money — or commitment — do your own survey. ask your existing clients, your friends, their friends — anybody. but don’t guess. know.
  2. the position must be based on may take the position — and advertise — that you do better audits, or write better briefs. but if you can’t prove it, or it just isn’t so, you’re ultimately going to lose more than you gain. don’t promise what you can’t deliver. the acoustics of the marketplace are magnificent, and if your promise is not deliverable, you’ll get caught and hung.
  3. the position you choose mustspring from — and be driven by –your own business strategy. you’ve got to look at your firm … see who you are and what you want to be … consider partner aspirations … weigh skills, strengths and weaknesses. if you ignore this step, you stand in danger of not only selling a mythical firm, but of being unable to deliver what you sell.
  4. there are at least two waysin which a position can be determined. the first is a perception of the market needs, however that perception is arrived at. the second is to choose market opportunity. the first is a careful analysis of what the market wants and needs, and that you can supply. the second sees an opportunity that may not have existed before. either way, the position must be reinforced in a proper marketing campaign.
  5. either work with available skills, ordevelop new skillsbeforethe positioning program begins. it’s one thing to recognize the opportunities for your firm for helping small companies because of clinton administration proposals, and to choose a position based upon the needs of small businesses. it’s another thing to have a real ability to serve those needs.
  6. choose a single position point.diverse positions are impossible to sell effectively, and each position, instead of reinforcing the others, dilutes them all. one point, one thrust. examples cited by one expert, paul cole of decision research, are based on the observation that a customer’s overall impression of a company is one-dimensional. “pepsi, for example, is associated with youth. volvo with safety, burger king with flame-broiled food,” he says. most recently, twa is stressing comfort and leg room in its planes. “only when a market has fully accepted the unique position,” says cole, “should a company attempt to build positioning extensions. now that bmw is fully associated with full performance, it can begin to extend its positioning to luxury as well.”
  7. reis and trout point outthat the only company with a predefined position is the market leader — the number one company in the field. it tells the market that the market itself prefers that company. it also defines the market from which competitors must capture a share, if possible.
  8. emphasis, in positioning,must always be on how the public will perceive the firm, and not on how the firm perceives itself, or would like to be perceived. the position must stem from the reality of the firm and the market, and not from an arbitrary notion of what will sell, regardless of the reality of what the firm is. reality counts, not image. the danger in the concept of image is that it implies that symbols can be manipulated to control any image — even one that’s not rooted in reality. it simply isn’t true. if you don’t like the perception that the public has of your reality, change your firm, not the symbols.
  9. when the position is determined,it must be communicated internally, even before it’s communicated externally. simply, if you’re going to tell the world who you are, don’t you think you should tell your own staff and colleagues first? after all, they’re the ones who have to breathe life into the position, aren’t they?

given the defined position, three things must be kept in mind:

  1. positions are dynamic.they should be rethought periodically, in every aspect, to be sure that they still apply. the market may change, or you may change.
  2. no position will work ifit doesn’t, in some way, differentiate your firm from others.
  3. the position is ultimatelynothing more than a platform to project your firm’s ability to meet the needs and expectations of a prospective clientele. the marketing program, in all its aspects, must be used to make that position live and viable as a marketing device.
click to buy
click to buy

bruce w. marcus is a pioneer in professional services marketing and coauthor of “client at the core.” this is adapted from his new book, “professional services marketing 3.0,”available for purchase here.

copyright. used by permission.