hoisted from comments: ron baker cites cpe “lunacy”
ron baker, value-pricing pioneer at versage.com, comments on gary bolinger: the uncertain future of cpe [video]:

right on, gary. as an instructor providing cpe since 1995, our system is totally antiquated. the question of “how do you measure that?,” i believe, is the wrong question.
i’ll tell you how you don’t measure education: hours that butts sit in (uncomfortable) chairs. that measures inputs, not outputs. not measuring would be superior to this completely ignorant measurement. we only use it because it’s easy and can be precise. but it’s precisely wrong. i’d rather be approximately right.
i do think there are ways to do it better. have the instructors certify someone’s learning. this doesn’t just have to be a test. we have to stop being afraid of subjective judgments and letting the free market sort out quality, since they are both far superior than precisely wrong measures.
i applaud you for speaking out about this. i’ve been tilting at this windmill for years. the status quo is well invested, so i fear nothing will change. like you, i put my faith in the younger cpas who see the lunacy of the current system.
see the original at gary bolinger: the uncertain future of cpe [video]

here at 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间, ed mendlowitz answers some of the toughest questions practitioners can throw at him. he’s the right one to ask. after more than 40 years in the business – building his own practice, running the firm, and eventually selling it to a major regional firm, withumsmith+brown, where he remains a senior partner and consultant to professional services clients – he has the answers. we’re happy to have him at 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间. send your questions for ed 

good, bad, ugly or indifferent… here are some results of the latest two-minute reader survey. thank you for your interest, support, honest feedback and helpful criticisms. we’ll keep working on delivering to you the kind of actionable information you can use to profit in your practice and in your career.
